Shishi Land Planning And Housing Authority Attaches Importance To Document Processing And News Writing.

In order to further improve cadres and workers

Level, standardize the handling of official documents, strengthen the sense of secrecy of the staff members of the organs, the staff members of the Municipal Bureau of state organs, all the staff and staff of the Bureau, the official documents processing staff of the local units, and the new recruits in 2015, and take part in the official documents of the land and resources system of the province in December 9th.

In December 17th, Wu Hansong, director of the government information and news writing and document processing training society, invited the director of the Shishi daily news and political news center to give lectures on official propaganda and news writing skills, and the official documents processing personnel in the Bureau carried out training and answering questions in the rules of official documents, confidentiality and the handling of official documents.

The conference advocates work.

To enhance the efficiency and quality of document processing, all cadres and staff members are required to write more, practise and think more, improve their writing level, give full play to the role of propaganda posts such as government information columns, strengthen publicity of laws and regulations, highlight propaganda policies on land resources and real estate, highlight the new achievements of the city's planning, highlight the new initiatives, new achievements and new experiences formed in the work of publicity units, create a good publicity atmosphere, help the masses understand relevant policies and regulations, let all sectors of the society understand and support the development of land planning and real estate development in our city.

Related links:

With the development of science and technology and economy and the quickening pace of life, saving time and efficiency has become the universal demand of contemporary society.

Reflected in the official document writing, it is concise and clear, which is more popular and emphasized.

In many countries, it is regarded as a reform of official documents.

For example, in 1976, Singapore set up the "Working Committee for the reform of applied Chinese Literature", and formulated the outline of Chinese applied literature reform, aiming at "making the application text easy to learn, easy to write, quick and simple communication tools, so as to better and more widely serve modern Singapore society."

For example, the former president of the United States, in order to study how to reform and streamline the style of writing, specially organized a class attended by 200 federal government officials. He also took the lead in putting the first sentence of the president's signature order, "I take the power of the United States Constitution and laws to give the president of the United States," the order was issued as follows: "I command as president of the United States", which promoted the reform of American style of writing. "Carter"

How can official writing be short?

First, one thing and one text, the purpose is clear.

The official documents must be clear, centralized and single.

For every document to solve any problem, we must first establish a clear center, and then closely organize the material around this center.

In addition to comprehensive reports, it is generally necessary to adopt the method of "one thing, one article", especially when asking for official documents.

In doing so, it is not only convenient for contractors, but also convenient for post filing and filing.

Otherwise, a number of events will inevitably lead to "multi centers", which will lead to lengthy and messy phenomena, which will be pointless, thus affecting the smooth realization of the purpose of writing.

Two, concise and clear, neat and neat.

Official documents must convey some information directly and quickly, so their terms must be concise and concise.

Include:

First, abandon unnecessary explanations and explanations.

In official document writing, it is sometimes necessary to explain or explain the contents accurately.

However, we must pay attention to the principle of "necessity" and "moderation". We should not overuse it, resulting in tedious and lengthy space.

In this way, we should try our best to avoid such explanations or declarative statements as "yes", "yes" and "to say".

Secondly, delete the dispensable words, words, sentences and paragraphs.

This is mainly accomplished in the revision of official documents.

Needless to say, a good article is changed. "The article is not tired of changing, but it is a good one." "the ability to write well is to delete the skills that are not well written" (Chekhov).

Mr. Lu Xun said, "at least two times after finishing writing, it is no pity to try to delete the words and phrases that are dispensable."

Comrade Mao Zedong made further extensions to this point and pointed out: "Mr. Lu Xun said at least two times, at the very least, he did not say.

If I want to see it, I should look at it ten times, seriously modify it, and then take it out. "

Of course, it is not entirely suitable for official documents to write for the sake of seeking a stable word, breaking several stems and having three sentences and two streams of tears. Because many documents are "urgent articles". They are often "to hand in tasks today and to make manuscripts tomorrow".

But in the case of time and conditions, the spirit of serious revision is very worth advocating, and it is also necessary to ensure the quality of official documents.

After finishing the draft of the official document, it is necessary to check again and again, seriously modify it, focus on some efforts in language expression, and try to delete the words, words, sentences and paragraphs which are dispensable.

For this reason, it is necessary to pay special attention: will the word, word, sentence and paragraph be deleted if there is any effect on the content of the official document? Will it make people ambiguous? Is context meaning still coherent and smooth? And so on, if there is no obstruction, we should boldly cut it out so as to save words and reduce space.

Third, eliminate layers of "stereotypes", do not start "wearing cap", also can not end "wear boots".

In the current official document writing, "stereotyped words" are repeatedly prohibited, and their performances are two: one is the beginning of "wearing a hat", such as "under the guidance of the spirit of the central document * * * document, under the care of the Party committee and the government at the higher level, under the direct leadership of the leadership of this unit, after the joint efforts of all the cadres and staff."

And so on; two is the end of "wear boots", such as "let's struggle together", "we have achieved the above results, but far from the leadership requirements," and so on.

These two tendencies can only lead to empty expression in words, without any practical significance, and should be resolutely excluded.

Three, you use "straight pen".

The regulations on official document writing of Party and government organs clearly stipulate that drafting of official documents should be "straightforward and unsound", which is determined by the nature of official documents.

Official documents are highly policy oriented and instructive. Therefore, when writing, they must be straight forward. If they can express their contents accurately and clearly, they will not be able to beat around the bush.

We should use generality, declarative language, and use less or no descriptive and lyrical language.

Too much publicity or "rendering" of things or problems will inevitably lead to lengthy and messy space, which will affect the quality and effectiveness of official documents.